Eleven findings
Japan's scholarly publishing system is not weak because it lacks institutions. It is weak because the institutions it has were designed to solve a 1990s problem — getting Japanese journals online — and the problem has since changed to getting Japanese journals read, cited, licensed and machine-readable.
Ownership is not the problem; distribution is
Japanese learned societies own and control their journals. What they do not own is the machinery that makes a journal visible: hosting at scale, indexing, marketing and global sales. That layer has been delegated to foreign publishers — and every journal that sustained a top-quartile position in 2016–2018 was published under such a contract.1
The state built plumbing, not publishing
J-STAGE, JaLC, CiNii and JAIRO Cloud are free or near-free national utilities of high quality. But total state support for journal publishing runs at about ¥0.71bn a year, against roughly ¥43bn of foreign subscription spending and ¥12.9bn of article-processing charges. Japan finances other countries' publishing infrastructure far more generously than its own.2,3,4
‘Free’ has been mistaken for ‘open’
More than 80% of J-STAGE journals can be read at no cost, and Japan's share of ‘diamond’ open access — free to read and free to publish — is the highest of any major research nation measured here, at 20.6%. But in 2022 only 6% of J-STAGE titles carried an explicit reuse licence. Free-to-read content is invisible to text mining, translation and AI retrieval workflows.5,6
Machine-readability is the binding constraint
Only 281 of 3,705 current J-STAGE journals deposited full-text JATS XML in FY2025 — 7.6%, against near-100% for overseas publishers. J-STAGE has responded by making full-text XML deposit mandatory during FY2029 and PDF optional, and by supplying a free conversion tool. This is the single most consequential technical decision in Japanese scholarly publishing this decade.6
The university press sector is real but tiny
Twenty-four presses, most with fewer than fifteen staff, published 535 books between them in 2025 — roughly the output of two or three large Western presses. They publish almost no journals, hold almost no endowments, and in the one published profit-and-loss account earn 87% of their income from commissioned work for their own university rather than from book sales.7,8
The mandate arrived without a budget
The Cabinet Office's February 2024 policy requires immediate, zero-embargo deposit of peer-reviewed articles and underlying data from designated competitive funds, effective for rounds first advertised from FY2025. Compliance is expected through green open access in institutional repositories. There is no national APC fund. The measurable effect so far is policy adoption: 298 universities now have a formal open-access policy, up from 171 two years earlier.9,10
Collective bargaining is the new front
Because no national read-and-publish settlement was possible, the RU11 research universities formed OASE and then OASE+ and negotiated publisher by publisher. Springer Nature (December 2025), Wiley and ACS (August 2026) and Elsevier (September 2026) have now signed. The deals remain opt-in and university-by-university, covering institutions in the tens rather than the hundreds.11,12,13
Volume is not the problem — visibility is
Japan's output has been broadly stable since the mid-2010s: about 148,000 journal articles a year from Japanese-affiliated authors in 2024. What has collapsed is influence. Japan's share of the world's top-10% cited papers fell from 6.0% in 1999–2001 to 1.7% in 2021–2023, taking its rank from fourth to thirteenth.14,5
A small share of a large global register
Japan accounts for 723 of Crossref's 33,849 members (2.1%) and 2.77m of its 174.2m DOIs (1.59%). Deposits by Japanese members peaked around 2007 at nearly 60,000 DOIs a year and have since fallen by roughly a quarter. Even this understates Japanese activity, because much of it is registered through the domestic agency JaLC rather than direct with Crossref.15,16
The domestic market is contracting underneath all of it
The Japanese publishing market has fallen for four consecutive years and print dropped below ¥1 trillion for the first time in 2025. Digital growth is almost entirely comics: text e-books are a ¥45.9bn market, three-tenths of one percent of the total. Specialist books carry higher return rates than trade titles, and mid-size bookshops are shrinking their specialist floor space.17
There is a coherent reform blueprint, and it is unimplemented
The Science Council of Japan proposed in 2020 exactly what the system lacks: flat-rate offset contracts negotiated nationally, a journal-publishing service corporation with professional editorial teams, machine translation for bilingual publishing, and a Japanese-language citation index. Six years on, the elements have been adopted piecemeal — OASE+ for negotiation, J-STAGE consulting for publishing support — but not as a programme.18,13
The shape of the system
Five layers, each with a different owner, funding source and incentive. The unusual feature of the Japanese arrangement is that the layer which owns the content (societies) is not the layer which monetises it (international publishers), and the layer which hosts it (the state) has no commercial stake at all.
Compiled from the sources cited throughout this profile. “Organisations” counts bodies publishing on J-STAGE at 31 March 2026.6
The five layers in detail
Each layer is described by what it owns, how it is funded, and where its structural weakness lies.
Learned societies (学会)
Almost every Japanese scholarly journal is owned by a learned society. There is no Japanese equivalent of Elsevier or Springer at home: the society is publisher of record, and it either hosts the journal itself on the national platform or hands production and global sales to a foreign house.6,15,19,1
University presses (大学出版部)
Twenty-four presses, collectively staffed by a few hundred people, publish roughly 535 scholarly books a year and almost no journals. They are structurally dependent on commissioned publishing for their own universities rather than on the book market.20,7,8
Domestic commercial publishers
Japan has a deep bench of commercial scholarly publishers, but with few exceptions they publish books, textbooks and professional magazines. The peer-reviewed journal layer simply is not theirs.21,22,23,24
National platform and infrastructure
Japan built a national answer to commercial publishing infrastructure: a free journal platform, a national DOI registration agency, a research-data cloud and a single discovery layer. The state funds plumbing, not publishing.6,16,25,26,27,28
International publishers
Japan's internationalisation strategy has been delegation. The country's best-known English journals are owned by societies but produced, hosted and sold by Oxford, Springer Nature, Wiley, IOP, Elsevier or Taylor & Francis — each with a long-established Tokyo presence.1,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37
What the numbers show
Nine quantitative views of the system. Where a figure was measured directly from a public API for this profile, that is stated; those measurements are reproducible from the endpoint given in the source list.
The platform grew — and kept growing through the pandemic
J-STAGE titles and participating publishing organisations, fiscal year-end. Titles include proceedings and ceased journals.
Machine-readability is the weakest link
Current J-STAGE journals by depth of XML deposit. Bibliographic XML covers only the citation metadata; full-text XML makes the article body machine-readable.
Where J-STAGE's readers are
Downloads by country, FY2025 (673m total).
Certified open access: Japan barely registers
Journals in DOAJ by country of publisher, September 2026. DOAJ lists journals that meet its certification criteria, including an explicit reuse licence.
A structural decline in Japan's share of the scientific record
Japan's share of the world's most-cited papers, fractional counts, natural sciences (NISTEP).
Japanese research output is stable, not growing
Journal articles with at least one Japan-affiliated author (OpenAlex, measured for this profile).
Who publishes Japanese research at home
Japanese-located Crossref members by cumulative registered DOIs (all years, measured for this profile).
DOI deposits by Japanese members peaked around 2007
Crossref DOIs registered by Japanese-located members, by the issued year of the content (measured for this profile).
Twenty-four presses, 535 books
New titles published by AJUP member presses, calendar 2025, as reported in the association's monthly 新刊速報.
Japan's open access is unusually ‘free’ rather than licensed
Open-access status of journal articles by author-affiliation country, 2023 (OpenAlex, measured for this profile). Percentages of each country's journal-article total.
The country league table
Papers, top-10% and top-1% cited papers, 2021–2023 average, fractional counts (NISTEP 2025).
| Country | Papers | Share % | Rank | Top 10% | Share % | Rank | Top 1% | Share % | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 599,435 | 29.1 | 1 | 73,315 | 35.6 | 1 | 7,458 | 36.2 | 1 |
| United States | 289,791 | 14.1 | 2 | 32,781 | 15.9 | 2 | 3,910 | 19.0 | 2 |
| India | 91,997 | 4.5 | 3 | 7,697 | 3.7 | 4 | 614 | 3.0 | 5 |
| Germany | 72,762 | 3.5 | 4 | 6,845 | 3.3 | 5 | 718 | 3.5 | 4 |
| Japan | 70,225 | 3.4 | 5 | 3,447 | 1.7 | 13 | 293 | 1.4 | 12 |
| United Kingdom | 65,203 | 3.2 | 6 | 8,396 | 4.1 | 3 | 1,000 | 4.9 | 3 |
| Italy | 60,712 | 3.0 | 7 | 6,428 | 3.1 | 6 | 484 | 2.4 | 7 |
| South Korea | 58,382 | 2.8 | 8 | 4,380 | 2.1 | 9 | 360 | 1.8 | 9 |
| France | 44,976 | 2.2 | 9 | 3,730 | 1.8 | 11 | 342 | 1.7 | 10 |
| Spain | 44,789 | 2.2 | 10 | 3,767 | 1.8 | 10 | 330 | 1.6 | 11 |
Where the money goes
The decisive fact about Japanese academic publishing is the asymmetry between what Japan pays to read and publish in other countries' journals and what it invests in its own.
Annual flows, ¥ billion
What Japanese universities and funders spend, against what the state spends on publishing Japanese research.
The state's publishing support, at true scale
The two KAKENHI 研究成果公開促進費 streams that fund publishing itself.
Who receives Japan's article-processing charges
Estimated APC paid by Japanese-institution authors, 2023, top five publishers (JUSTICE).
The domestic market underneath
Estimated Japanese publishing market by segment, ¥ billion (出版科学研究所).
How a society journal is actually financed
Three revenue sources, in descending order of reliability, and one growing cost. Membership dues are the floor. The Physical Society of Japan charges ¥12,000 a year for full membership and ¥8,000 for students, with journal access sold as a surcharge: ¥9,900 for online JPSJ, ¥15,400 for print and online, ¥3,000 for JJAP; PTEP is free because it is open access.19 The Japanese-language 機関誌 is bundled into those dues and functions as a membership benefit rather than a product. The English 英文誌 is the financially exposed item, and it is where outsourcing happens.
Publication charges and APCs are the second source, and their direction of travel is unambiguous. The Physical Society states plainly that PTEP has run a chronic deficit since its JSPS open-access grant ended, and that the move to open access shifts scholarly publishing “from a subscription-based to a publication-charge-based” business model. For comparative purposes the society cited an average APC of about €1,100 across the journals it tendered, against US$2,500 for APS Physical Review D and US$2,310 for Elsevier's Physics Letters A. High-energy-physics papers in PTEP are APC-free under SCOAP3, funded by more than 70 Japanese university libraries redirecting subscription money.19
Not every society passes costs to authors. The Japanese Society for Immunology states that International Immunology, which the society owns and edits and OUP publishes, levies no submission fee, no page charge and no online colour charge.37 Where journals do move to open access, the pattern is a subsidy in the transition: JpGU covers APCs in full for invited papers in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science and gives members and review articles a 20% discount, funded by KAKENHI 国際情報発信強化 grants.44
Japan's commercial scholarly publishers earn their money differently — from textbooks, reference works, professional magazines and library agency work rather than from journal subscriptions. Maruzen-Yushodo, the largest academic agent, reported roughly ¥34.2bn of revenue in FY2026/1 with about 4,130 staff and some 280 outsourced library and museum operations, and is a subsidiary of the printing group DNP.21
How the system got here
Twenty-seven years of platform-building, followed by a sudden and largely unfunded open-access mandate, and then a hard turn to collective bargaining.
J-STAGE launches with three journals
JST builds a national e-journal platform because Japanese societies cannot afford their own systems and are outsourcing to foreign publishers.45
JUSTICE is formed
The two library consortia merge into a single national negotiating body for electronic resources.46
JaLC accredited as a DOI registration agency
Japan gains its own DOI registration agency, jointly founded by JST, NII, NIMS and the National Diet Library.25
First J-STAGE medium-to-long-term strategy
The platform shifts from digitisation to strengthening journals and open access.47
China launches its journal cluster plan
The 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划 funds 285 projects with published per-journal grants of up to ¥5.2m RMB a year — a scale Japan does not match.48
Science Council of Japan calls for structural reform
Proposes flat-rate offset contracts, a national journal-publishing service corporation, and a Japanese-language citation index.18
Jxiv preprint server and the DOAJ–J-STAGE partnership
Japan's first full-scale preprint server launches; DOAJ and JST begin systematically indexing J-STAGE journals.40
Cabinet Office adopts the immediate open-access policy
The 基本方針 requires immediate, zero-embargo green OA for peer-reviewed articles and underlying data from designated competitive funds.9
J-STAGE passes 4,000 titles; strategy revised
Metadata quality and active dissemination are added as a fourth strategic pillar.45
Chemical Society of Japan moves its flagship journals to OUP
BCSJ and Chemistry Letters transfer to Oxford University Press from January 2024, continuing the delegation pattern.33
Implementing measures agreed; FAQ clarified
Interim concession: immediate free access without an explicit licence counts as compliance.9
FY2025 funding rounds become the first subject to the mandate
KAKENHI, JST's 戦略的創造研究推進事業, AMED's 革新的先端研究開発支援事業 and 創発的研究支援事業 are in scope.9
OASE+ replaces OASE for transformative-agreement talks
The RU11 research universities widen their negotiating group to cover five major publishers.13
Full-text JATS XML deposit announced as mandatory
Journals must deposit current articles as full-text XML during FY2029; PDF deposit becomes optional.6
~4 million Japanese repository records flow into OpenAlex
NII exposes IRDB metadata internationally under JPCOAR Schema v2.0.27
Elsevier and ACS read-and-publish agreements announced
Follows Springer Nature (Dec 2025) and Wiley (Aug 2026); the agreements remain opt-in and university-by-university.13
What the 2024 mandate does and does not do
In scope
Peer-reviewed articles in electronic journals, including the author-accepted manuscript, plus the underlying data that journal policy requires to be published. Japanese-language articles are covered: the obligation is not English-only. Immediate deposit with zero embargo into an institutional repository or equivalent infrastructure, findable through the NII Research Data Cloud, is the compliance route. Free immediate access on the journal site counts in the interim, even without an explicit licence.
Out of scope
Preprints, research reports, books, and non-peer-reviewed 紀要 content. Funds advertised in or before FY2024 are excluded, so the mandate binds only new grants. There is no national APC budget and no gold-open-access requirement, so publishers face no mandate to change their licences — only to tolerate repository deposit. That is why the policy has produced repository build-out rather than a licensing transformation.9,49
Eight structural problems
These are not eight separate failures. They are one failure — a system optimised for national digital access in 1999 that never converted that access into international visibility — seen from eight angles.
The quality–quantity scissors
Japan still produces the world's fifth-largest volume of research but only 1.7% of the most-cited papers. Because domestic journals are largely invisible internationally, Japanese authors publish abroad, which in turn starves the domestic journals of the best submissions. The two effects reinforce each other.14
Free access is not open access
J-STAGE reports that more than 80% of its journals are free to read. But J-STAGE's own definition of an open-access journal requires an explicit reuse licence. In 2022 only 214 of 3,632 titles (6%) were true OA, against 2,943 (81%) that were merely free — a distinction that keeps most Japanese content out of text-mining, translation and reuse pipelines.6
Full-text XML: a 7.6% foothold
Only 281 of 3,705 current J-STAGE journals deposited full-text JATS XML in FY2025, against near-100% for overseas publishers. Without machine-readable full text, Japanese articles are poorly served by indexing, translation, citation analysis and AI retrieval. J-STAGE has responded by making full-text XML deposit mandatory during FY2029 and by providing a free conversion tool.6
The money flows outward
Japanese universities spend roughly ¥43bn a year on foreign journal subscriptions and a further ~¥12.9bn on APCs, while the state's entire journal-publishing support programme disburses about ¥0.71bn. The country is a large net financier of foreign publishing infrastructure and a marginal investor in its own.3
Policy without a budget
The February 2024 immediate-OA mandate is green-OA-based and carries no dedicated funding. Its measurable effect has been institutional policy adoption — 298 universities now have a formal OA policy, up by 83 in a single year — and a hard turn to collective bargaining, not a boom in Japanese open-access publishing.10
Delegation has a price
Contract publishing delivered global visibility for Japan's best journals — all nine Japanese titles that sustained a Q1 position across 2016–2018 were published by major commercial houses. But editorial control, pricing and platform relationships sit abroad, and the arrangement gives Japan very little say over the economics of its own output.1
The university press squeeze
Between them, Japan's 24 university presses publish about 535 books a year — roughly what two or three large Western presses produce. The core state subsidy for scholarly monographs has fallen from just under ¥700m in FY2006 to ¥268m in FY2024, and commissioned publishing, not the book market, keeps the presses solvent.43
A shrinking domestic market
The Japanese publishing market has declined for four consecutive years and print fell below ¥1 trillion for the first time in 2025. E-book growth is almost entirely comics: text e-books are a ¥45.9bn market, 0.3% of the whole. Specialist books also carry structurally higher return rates than general trade titles.17
Japan, China and South Korea
Three non-anglophone research systems, three different answers to the same problem: how to make national scholarship internationally visible. Japan chose delegation; China chose cash and consolidation; Korea chose platform.
| Dimension | Japan | China | South Korea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internationalisation strategy | Delegated to commercial publishers through 委託出版 contracts | State-directed journal clusters with per-journal cash grants | National platform (KoreaScience/KCI) plus journal tiering |
| Principal state instrument | KAKENHI 研究成果公開促進費 — ≈¥0.71bn total in FY2025, awarded to societies | 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划 — 285 projects from 2019, up to ¥5.2m RMB per journal per year | KISTI platform operation and tiering of ~110 journals |
| Platform | J-STAGE — 4,396 titles from 2,728 organisations | No single national platform; journals spread across publishers and CNKI/Wanfang aggregators | KoreaScience and KCI operated by KISTI |
| Open-access posture | Immediate green OA mandated for designated funds from FY2025; no APC fund | OA rate above 20% by 2019, the highest of the four compared countries | OA rate just over 10% by 2019 |
| Q1 journal share (2019 analysis) | More JIF journals than China, Korea or France — but the lowest Q1 ratio of the four; 15 Q1 titles in 2018 | Conspicuously high Q1 share among the four | Rapidly growing presence; top-10 JIF titles from around 2013–2014 |
| Structural weakness | Fragmentation: 2,728 organisations publishing, almost no consolidation, little international visibility | Dependence on state funding cycles; international editorial credibility still being built | Small domestic base relative to output; platform reach still limited |
China's instrument is the 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划, launched in 2019 with 285 funded projects and published per-journal grants reaching ¥5.2m RMB a year for leading titles, with a second phase from 2024. Korea's is KISTI's operation of KoreaScience and the Korea Citation Index alongside tiering of roughly 110 journals. Japan's nearest equivalent, the KAKENHI 研究成果公開促進費, disbursed ¥0.71bn in total in FY2025.48,50,2
What is solid, what is partial, what is missing
Japanese academic publishing is unusually poorly served by published statistics for a G7 economy. Some of the most important quantities — society contract terms, academic print runs, the size of the scholarly market itself — are simply not public. This register states which claims in this profile rest on primary data and which do not.
A note on method: this profile was compiled from primary documents — corporate and government disclosures, association bulletins, platform operator presentations and standards documents — supplemented by direct measurement from the Crossref, OpenAlex and DOAJ public APIs. Where a figure could not be verified, it has been omitted rather than estimated. The most recent authoritative data available at the time of writing is from 2024–2026.
References
Numbered references, keyed to the superscripts used throughout. Entries marked “measured” in the confidence register are reproducible from the endpoints listed here.
- 1棚橋佳子・辻幸子・野村紀匡, 「日本の学協会ジャーナル出版の現状」, 情報の科学と技術 69(11): 535–541 (2019). DOI 10.18919/jkg.69.11_535Q1 count and persistence, OA rates, ESCI review outcomes, 委託出版 concentration.
- 2JSPS, 科研費配分状況一覧(令和7年度新規採択分), Dec 2025.FY2025 whole-programme totals: 424 new awards, ¥502.8m; ¥711.7m including continuations.
- 3JUSTICE (大学図書館コンソーシアム連合), 2024年度 契約状況調査結果報告, Mar 2025.Consortium foreign-journal spend ¥43.0bn vs domestic ¥3.45bn (2024).
- 4JUSTICE, 論文公表実態調査報告 (2024年度), 31 Mar 2025.Estimated APC paid by Japanese-institution authors: ¥12.94bn in 2023, with publisher breakdown.
- 5OpenAlex API — open-access structure by author country, 2023 (measured for this profile).Open-access status composition of journal articles for Japan, China, the US, the UK, Germany, South Korea and France, and DOAJ-journal shares. Filter definitions follow OpenAlex field conventions.
- 6JST, “J-STAGEの現況と全文XML登載必須化について”, Information Infrastructure Dept., presented 24 July 2026 (FY2025 year-end data, 31 Mar 2026).Sole source for J-STAGE FY2025 counts, XML-readiness ratio, download geography, and the FY2029 full-text XML mandate.
- 7AJUP, 新刊速報 2025年12月号 (cumulative calendar-2025 new-title table by press).The only public, press-by-press output series for Japanese university presses.
- 8中央大学, 2024年度 財務・事業報告 (Chuo University Press divisional accounts, FY2024).The only full P&L for a Japanese university press located: 87% of income from commissioned publishing.
- 9Cabinet Office, 統合イノベーション戦略推進会議, 「学術論文等の即時オープンアクセスの実現に向けた基本方針」(decided 16 Feb 2024); 実施にあたっての具体的方策 (21 Feb 2024); FAQ (rev. 8 Oct 2024).The national immediate-OA mandate: scope, funders, embargo rules, exclusions.
- 10MEXT, 学術情報基盤実態調査 (令和7年度, published 24 Mar 2026; FY2024 actuals).Library materials spend split print/electronic; OA and research-data policy adoption counts.
- 11ESAC Initiative, Transformative Agreement Registry: wiley2025justice.67 universities, ~2,900 OA articles, capped, cost increase, not publicly disclosed.
- 12Elsevier press release, 12 Oct 2023 — Japan's largest transformative agreement.57-university negotiating team, 140 interested institutions, opt-in per university.
- 13OASE / OASE+ (Open Access for Scholarly Empowerment), news archive.Transformative agreements announced Dec 2025 – Sep 2026 with Springer Nature, Wiley, ACS, Elsevier and T&F.
- 14MEXT/NISTEP, 科学技術指標2025 (調査資料-349) and 科学研究のベンチマーキング2025 (調査資料-350), both published 8 Aug 2025.Bibliometric ranks and country shares, 1999–2001 through 2021–2023.
- 15Crossref REST API — full member register and per-member DOI counts, retrieved for this profile.All 33,849 members swept; DOI counts and issued-year breakdowns computed locally.
- 16Japan Link Center (JaLC), 第12回 JaLC 対話集会 資料, 2 Feb 2026 (data to end-Dec 2025).86 full and 3,448 associate members; 14.14m cumulative DOIs; content-type mix.
- 17全国出版協会・出版科学研究所, 出版指標 news release, 26 Jan 2026 (calendar 2025 estimates).Total publishing market ¥1,546.2bn; print below ¥1 trillion for the first time.
- 18日本学術会議, 提言「学術情報流通の大変革時代に向けた学術情報環境の再構築と国際競争力強化」, 28 Sept 2020.The four-part reform proposal, incl. a journal-publishing service corporation and flat-rate offset contracts.
- 19日本物理学会, PTEP page and 2024年度事業計画.PTEP's chronic deficit after its JSPS OA grant ended; APC benchmarks; SCOAP3 participation.
- 20大学出版部協会 (Association of Japanese University Presses), 私たちの組織 / Our Organization.24 member presses as of June 2026; legal form history; FY2026 board.
- 21丸善雄松堂, 数字で見る丸善雄松堂 (corporate data).FY2026/1 revenue ≈ ¥34.2bn; ~4,130 staff; ~280 outsourced library operations.
- 22株式会社国際文献社, 沿革 (corporate history).Society-secretariat outsourcing since 1995; J-STAGE support since 2002; the 2004 collapse of 学会事務センター.
- 23中西印刷株式会社, English company profile.Founded 1865; society-office contracting; OUP cooperation from 1999.
- 24一般財団法人 学会誌刊行センター (CAPJ), 財団概要.Founded 1971 from the University of Tokyo Press's 20th-anniversary project.
- 25JaLC, Japan Link Centerの歩み.Founding in 2012 with JST, NII, NIMS and the National Diet Library; DataCite membership 2014.
- 26NII, 国立情報学研究所概要 2025 (NII Summary 2025).CiNii Research, Research Data Cloud, and PID integration.
- 27NII news release, 18 Aug 2026 — ~4 million Japanese repository records integrated into OpenAlex.IRDB scale and JPCOAR Schema v2.0 exposure.
- 28JPCOAR, JAIRO Cloud (共同運用) 概要.822 institutions at end-FY2025; fee-based since FY2017.
- 29オックスフォード大学出版局株式会社, 会社概要.OUP Japan established 1 Nov 1957; represents 300+ Oxford Journals titles.
- 30Springer Nature Japan, 会社情報; シュプリンガー・ジャパン corporate history.Registered 25 Jan 1983; ~200 staff in Japan; exited Japanese-language publishing in 2012.
- 31Physics World, “How IOP Publishing supports physicists in Japan”, 16 Mar 2018.Tokyo office since 2002; publishing partner for JSAP (JJAP, APEX).
- 32STM Association, STM Japan Chapter.Membership and the annual STM–JST seminar for J-STAGE societies since 2017.
- 33日本化学会, BCSJ / Chemistry Letters OUP cooperation notice, 9 Jan 2024.The 2024 transfer of Japan's flagship chemistry journals to Oxford University Press.
- 34Wiley press release, 9 Sept 2013 — Cancer Science flips to Wiley Open Access from 1 Jan 2014.The first Japanese journal of its size to convert to full OA.
- 35日本農芸化学会, BBB 出版契約に関するお知らせ, 19 June 2020.Taylor & Francis (2014) → Oxford University Press (2021) migration.
- 36日本分析化学会, Analytical Sciences publication information (J-STAGE).Springer Nature hosting from Vol. 38 (2022) with the editorial board retained by the society.
- 37日本免疫学会, International Immunology information for scientists.Society owns and edits; OUP publishes; no submission, page or colour charges.
- 38XSPA (CrossRef Japan) — JATS XML seminars and J-STAGE cooperation.The practitioner community around JATS XML and Japanese scholarly publishing.
- 39DOAJ public journal metadata (API and CSV snapshot).Country benchmarking and the licence/APC profile of Japanese OA journals — measured directly for this profile.
- 40DOAJ blog, “Supporting the inclusion of J-STAGE journals in DOAJ”, 25 Mar 2022.The J-STAGE–DOAJ indexing partnership, 33 (2020) → 64 (2022).
- 41OpenAlex API — sources and works, retrieved for this profile.Japanese research-output trend 2000–2024, measured as journal-type works with at least one Japan-affiliated author.
- 42JSPS, 令和6年度 科学研究費助成事業 審査結果の総括.FY2024 学術図書 outcome: 516 applications, 172 awards, ¥267.7m.
- 43AJUP, 要望書 (17 June 2008 request to MEXT and JSPS on the 研究成果公開促進費 budget).The documented collapse of the academic-book subsidy from ~¥700m (FY2006) to ¥370m (FY2008).
- 44JST, 2025年度 英文誌「ジャーナルコンサルティング」募集要項.Free consulting programme, FY2025 course list, and J-STAGE's definition of open access.
- 45JST, 科学技術振興機構報 No.1691, 8 May 2024 — J-STAGE 25th anniversary; 4,000-title milestone (1 May 2024).Launch date, original motive, and 2024 milestone.
- 46JUSTICE, 2025年度 活動報告, 31 Mar 2026.Membership, negotiations with 48 publishers, 8 R&P and 2 APC-discount proposals for 2026.
- 47JST, J-STAGE中長期戦略 (2019) and revised strategy + roadmap (May 2024); 審議まとめ (April 2026).Strategic posture and the 2025–2029 roadmap.
- 48中国高校科技期刊研究会, 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划 2019年度入选项目公告, 22 Nov 2019.285 projects and published per-journal annual grants, up to ¥5.2m RMB.
- 49JST, “J-STAGE 発行機関向け「学術論文等の即時オープンアクセスの実現に向けた基本方針」への対応”, May 2025.Practical guidance to Japanese publishers on complying with the 2024 immediate-OA policy.
- 50KISTI, 학술지 유통환경 변화와 국내 학술지의 국제화 (KoreaScience / KCI and journal tiering).Korea's platform-led internationalisation model.